The EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) issues an important Decision on the scope of the exclusion to patentability of claims covering "essentially biological processes".
By Kerry Rees
December 2010 - The issue addressed by the EBA was the correct interpretation of the term "essentially biological processes for the production of plants and animals" used in the European Patent Convention (EPC) to exclude such processes from patentability. The EBA decided that claims to a process for the production of plants involving sexually crossing whole plant genomes, and the subsequent selection of plants, is not patentable, regardless of the degree of human intervention in the breeding process.
Specifically, the EBA decided that:
Rule 26(5) EPC excludes from patentability claims covering "essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals". To date the EPO has not given any useful guidance on how to interpret this exclusion.
Historically, the EPO has held that the use of marker genes to select particular plant characteristics to be a technical process and therefore patentable. In view of this, the EPO granted EP1069819 (broccoli patent) directed to a method of increasing the level of anticarcinogenic substances in broccoli plants by locating the relevant genes in the broccoli genome with genetic markers and selecting plant lines having high concentrations of the substance for plant breeding. Similarly, EP1211926 (tomato patent) was granted and is directed to a method of breeding tomatoes with reduced water content and to tomato plants produced by the method.
Gill Jennings & Every LLP
The Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Street,
London, EC2A 2ES
Phone: +44 (0)20 7655 8500
Fax: +44 (0)20 7655 8501
Email: gje@gje.co.uk
Website: www.gje.co.uk